Advertising

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:07 am

What do you think a trade war consist's
of?


The left likes to apply the word 'war' to everything. The pro-life movement is a war on women. Voter ID laws are wars waged against minorities. Securing the border is a war on immigrants.

As for China, we need to look back to the Clinton administration and NAFTA. Up to that point, China was nothing. Weak third world economy. Weak military. Now, after all the outsourcing from the US to China, their economy rivals our own and they are encroaching on us military even when we look at the South China Sea.

The Clintons are a cancer to the country. Hillary would have finished what her husband started... the complete sell out of the American middle class. The Bush family is also responsible for the sell out. And when it comes to the weakening of our government institutions, nobody has done a better job of that than Barry Soreto.

One positive sign, though, is that the lies we've been fed and believed have been weakened considerably with Trump's win. There would be no talk of immigration or border security with Hillary in office. Also, none of the abuses of power by the Obama administration would be coming to light either. The subversion of our democracy would have continued in the dark. Does anyone really believe that Hillary would start telling us the truth as POTUS?

We dodged a huge bullet.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Fri Apr 06, 2018 9:00 am

Former NSA employees conclude that the DNC hack was an inside job:

“There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial ‘hack,’ as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer,”
https://www.thenation.com/article/a-new ... -dnc-hack/


This backs up what Julian Assange and Kim Dotcom have said all along -- the hack of the DNC was NOT carried out by nation state like Russia, but rather, an inside source.

Robert Mueller's special counsel hasn't bothered to interview Assange or Dotcom. Nor have they inspected the DNC servers to find out what actually happened. Instead, they've moved completely away from the initial claims about hacking the election to now pursuing obstruction of justice charges. They have no crime to investigate but that's not stopping them from prosecuting for obstruction of the non-crime.

This also lends weight to the speculation surrounding the murder of Seth Rich. Here we have an actual crime that's unsolved... somebody with inside access to the DNC data who both Assange and Dotcom point to as the source. The MSM, however, is treating the Seth case as if it were already solved and there's proof beyond a doubt that this death had nothing to do with the election. This is always a key sign of propaganda when the MSM comes up with definitive determinations with no evidence at all.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:45 am

Wednesday, April 11th, is a big day to watch what happens with the deep state. Congress is demanding that acting AG Rosenstein turn over documents concerning Hillary's sham email investigation as well as the sham Trump investigation. The Repubs say that they will hold Rosenstein in contempt of Congress if he doesn't comply by Wednesday. If met with further delays, they will move to impeach Rosenstein.

If you take just a cursory view of the MSM sites, you'll see that none of them are reporting these developments. They're all still speculating on what Mueller has on Trump even though they all now agree that Trump is not even a target of Mueller's investigation. He's the subject, so they reason that 'something' could still turn up. Meanwhile, they're completely ignoring the collapse of the deep state that's protecting Hillary and Obama.

Congress says that the DOJ is withholding close to million documents from congressional oversight. What they really want is only around four documents, what the FBI used to start investigating Carter Page and the Trump campaign. With this we're waiting for confirmation rather than revelation. It is already known that the FBI used the Clinton Dossier to go after Trump. A document that Comey said himself in front of Congress that it was salacious and unverified. They also failed to disclose that the Clintons provided information that went into the document that they paid over $12 million dollars for.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Mon Apr 09, 2018 2:14 pm

The deep state strikes back:

The F.B.I. on Monday raided the office of President Trump’s longtime personal lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, seizing records related to several topics including payments to a pornographic-film actress.

Federal prosecutors in Manhattan obtained the search warrant after receiving a referral from the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, according to Mr. Cohen’s lawyer, who called the search “completely inappropriate and unnecessary.” The search does not appear to be directly related to Mr. Mueller’s investigation, but likely resulted from information he had uncovered and gave to prosecutors in New York.

“Today the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York executed a series of search warrants and seized the privileged communications between my client, Michael Cohen, and his clients,” said Stephen Ryan, his lawyer. “I have been advised by federal prosecutors that the New York action is, in part, a referral by the Office of Special Counsel, Robert Mueller.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/us/p ... cohen.html


So let's get this straight.... Stormy Daniels was working with the Russians?

Unbelievable.

Grasping at straws... desperate for anything. Mueller's team is in full-on panic mode now that Rosenstein is facing possible contempt of Congress and impeachment.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Tue Apr 10, 2018 10:03 am

Deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein reportedly personally approved the FBI raid Monday of President Trump's personal attorney, Michael Cohen.

The New York Times reported that Rosenstein signed off on the raid, in which the FBI seized emails, tax documents and records, some of them related to Cohen's payment to adult-film star Stormy Daniels.
http://thehill.com/homenews/administrat ... ump-lawyer


Rosenstein gave assurances in front of Congress that Mueller's Special Counsel would not veer away from their main task which is Russian interference in the election.

He lied.

The main task is not to find out what Russia did during the election. The SC knew before they started that Russian Collusion was manufactured by the Clinton campaign and advanced forward by the Obama administration as they were heading out of office.

The main goal of the SC, and apparently the FBI, is to get Trump.

And why? They need something on Trump before the indictments start coming their way. What we have now is a situation in which the crooks are in charge of the DOJ. Jeff Sessions is either incompetent or compromised. The fact that he's not stepping forward now that Mueller has clearly crossed the line probably means the latter -- the deep state has something on Sessions. He's not in-charge of the DOJ.

Our mainstream media doesn't care about abuse of power unless it involves Trump. They are currently giving cover to the most crooked attempted coup in our countries' history. To say that they have an agenda or bias is a misnomer. The MSM is engaging in propaganda. None of them are questioning the legitimacy and legality of Mueller's probe. The only question they want answered is what does he have on Trump.

Now we have Chuck Schumer and others saying that they have to pass a law to protect Mueller. They don't see the need to protect the president from unlawful prosecution. They are saying that Congress needs to act to protect a runaway investigation that has no legitimacy for starting in the first place. Without Comey and the crooked FBI, all of whom are now gone for their misdeeds, there would be no opportunity or reason for a special counsel.

Trump is in a real conundrum. He has the power to end the investigation today if he wants. Just fire them all... Mueller, Rosenstein.... even Jeff Sessions. The so called 'experts' are saying that will ruin Trump, but half the country will still be on his side. If he does nothing and allows Mueller to have his way, he could be ruined in other ways.

Mueller could have authorized the raid as bait for Trump to fire him. It's not out-of-the-question, because after two years of investigating they still have nothing. We know they have nothing on Russian Collusion because the SC leaks all the time and the best they've come up with is a Don Jr meeting with a Russian lawyer (organized by Fusion GPS) and an unpaid intern gossiping with an Australian diplomat (with ties to the Clintons).

I think Trump should hold tight and wait out the week. Mueller's raid is in response to Congress threatening contempt and impeachment of Rosenstein. The deep state is running out of time. They can't keep stalling on material facts forever. Congress has oversight of the DOJ. The DOJ has stonewalled Congressional investigators since the beginning. Meanwhile, they are brazenly going after Trump without even a crime to investigate.

This month is going to be explosive and consequential. For those people that hate Trump and therefore don't mind a little police state tactics to take him out.... think carefully about what's happening. If the deep state succeeds they will open up a new political strategy, whereby if you lose the election you can just go after your political opponent through the courts. If you're a powerful politician facing your own legal problems with corruption, just acuse your opponent of doing the same thing.

Can anyone imagine Bush doing this to Obama? People need to forget the Ds and the Rs and the skin color. What's happening right now is horrific -- A true constitutional crisis not a fake one that the media has portrayed against Trump.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:08 am

Samantha Powers, Obama's UN ambassador, unmasked Trump campaign officials hundreds of times during the election and the transition. FOIA requests are now coming back. Although heavily redacted there's some information that clearly shows what was happening. Take this email below, for example, from a 60 Minutes exec to Powers:


Owens, Bill ~~~~~~~~~~
Tuesday, November 15, 2016 12: 16 PM
Power, Samantha <PowerS@state.gov>
RE: me again!

Ambassador!

Please excuse the late reply. These past few weeks have been pretty swell around here too (First covering
Mosul, then the election).

You are right that we did a Syrian refugee piece, and perhaps you have had a moment to see it. We were
pleased and tried our best to untangle a lot of the rhetoric from the facts. If you'd like, at least on the Buffalo
story, I'd be happy to mention it to Pelley and his team at the Evening News.

I can only imagine the conversations you are having with some of our allies now and I would love a chance to
brainstorm. There are a few things happening that include some travel for me over the next week and a half, so
maybe after Thanksgiving?

It was nice to see your name pop up in my mailbox Samantha and I really appreciate how hard you, your staff
and the administration have been working on so many impossible issues all at once.

All my best,
Bill
Bill Owens
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/Powers-Emails-Timeline.pdf
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:17 am

The editor of 60 Minutes responded to Samantha's email sent on 11/11/16 (three days after the election):

Dear Bill:

Hope this email out of the blue finds you well. We're still reeling here, as you might imagine. My mission to the
UN is a cabinet agency under President Obama, but will be demoted to something very different in January.
Notwithstanding this, Tuesday's results have given us an even greater sense of urgency to get our work done in
our last few months. 70 good long days left!

I'm writing, unusually, because you came to my mind as I was talking to my team about a trip that I have decided
to take to the wild, exotic, remote locale of Buffalo, New York! After all the hot spots we have visited, I am
heading to Buffalo because it is one of the leading cities in resettling refugees - taking in more than 10,000
refugees since 2002, nearly half of them from Burma. And as part of the Administration's push to admit more

Syrian refugees, Buffalo has taken 262 Syrians this year alone, and, thought the city fits so many of the rust belt
characteristics - a declining population, shrinking industry - I gather refugees have provided a big boost to the
city, starting new business, revitalizing depressed commercial and residential areas. In essence, the trip will
show why the effort to take in more refugees should persist beyond the Obama Administration, particularly in
the midst of the largest refugee crisis since WWII. I'll likely be joined by Senator Gillibrand.

Now I gather you just did a segment, which I will watch this weekend, on the tough transition refugees generally
face, but as we were thinking of the trip, I was also being informed that the job of US Ambassador to the UN will
be downgraded by the Trump Administration to non-Cabinet level (typical of Republican administrations, but we
have never had so many of our core interests embedded here).
Indeed it is quite likely that my job - not a
priority -- will remain vacant for some time at a time of the world's most pressing crises. I am also being
inundated daily by questions from other countries about what the election means for eg the future of NATO, our
non pro efforts against Kim Jung Un, the Iran deal, Paris climate agt etc .. I am not sure exactly what I am
pitching, but it seems there could be something interesting to show through USUN about this waning
multilateral moment for the US, how we use these last two months, what we are trying to defend, how we are
consoling other countries, etc .. I wondered if there could be something in this that would hit home for viewers,
even or perhaps especially those who support Trump. Let me know if you would like to brainstorm.

Warmly,
Samantha
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/Powers-Emails-Timeline.pdf


The bolded part above about 'embedded interests' is very interesting. Powers is a UN ambassador. What reason would she have to investigate team Trump through unmasking?

We were told through Nunes and the House intel committee that these communications were all between Trump officials and foreign governments. As we know now, any communication with a non-American was free game for the Obama administration. They lowered the restrictions to allow their UN ambassador to do this. We were also told by Nunes that the vast majority of communications had nothing at all to do with Russia. Instead, the purpose, if we look at Samantha's own words, was to get out in front of several issues so that they could provide the proper narrative to the media.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:03 am

Deep state starting to fracture and turn on each other.

McCabe says Comey is lying about leak authorization. Lynch says Comey is lying about calling Hillary's investigation a 'matter'. Nobody disputes that Comey has told many lies.

Lynch's tarmac meeting with Clinton coming back into view. What did Bill promise Loretta for making the email investigation go away? Would she stay on as AG under Hillary.... maybe a new Supreme Court nominee. Rumors floating that there is documentation of the meeting that's set to be released soon.

Mueller wanted Trump to fire him after the raid on Cohen's law office. They need to take the attack to the next level, similar to what happened after Comey was fired and a special counsel was setup. Trump, wisely, did not take the bait.

IG report on McCabe is damning. The IG is expected to make criminal recommendations for McCabe soon. Also expected soon is the IG report on Comey. With Comey running his mouth on his book tour, there's no hurry for the report. Comey is not providing further information that's damning to Trump, just his own personal, sensitive feelings. Meanwhile, he continues to provide information showing that the investigations were corrupt to begin with. Comey says he made political calculations based on the odds of Hillary winning, says he was horrified that Trump won and his FBI might have played a part.
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:37 am

*
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Deep State

Postby HawkBowler on Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:54 am

*
 
Posts: 14822
Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 7:46 am
Location: Seattle, WA

PreviousNext

Return to Rant and Rave - Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Advertising